My main goal for Media Law and Ethics is that it not be a boring class. It used to be taught by old, white, male Law professors who assigned dreadfully dry Law textbooks and stood and lectured monotonously. I show videos, we talk about contemporary controversies, we play courtroom roles... it's as much fun as I can muster. The final exam is to write your own personal code of ethics, and these kids sometimes really surprise me with how much they're willing to put into them. One young woman ended hers with this anonymous quote:
"The world needs men and women... who cannot be bought; whose word is their bond; who put character above wealth; who possess opinions and a strong will; who are larger than their vocations; who do not hesitate to take risks; who will not lose their individuality in a crowd; who will be as honest in small affairs as in great; who will make no compromise with wrong; whose ambitions are not confined to their own selfish desires; who will not say they do it 'because everyone else does it;' who are true to their friends through good and bad, in adversity as well as prosperity; who do not believe that shrewdness, cunning, and hardheartedness are the best qualities for winning success; who are not ashamed or afraid to stand for truth when it is unpopular; who can say 'no' with emphasis, although all the rest of the world says 'yes.'"
That's what I'm going for. I'm trying to train a corps of freedom fighters -- young people who will go out and fight the negative consequences of media conglomeration by telling good, important stories. I have developed a radical and controversial teaching style. I do things all out. I hear rumors about me all over town! HA! Sometimes I have to clean up my messes after I've taken things a bit too far -- but it sure is provocative!
It's the same thing I did, or tried to do, with my former friends who've chosen to stay friends with The Ex Husband. I will stand like an old, strong tree in my conviction that domestic violence will not end until we -- all of us -- won't stand for it any more.
Hmpf. :-)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Really, I just say all the things I have always wanted to say but was afraid to... I get into the meat of the controversies... I show video of Ralph Reed and Pat Robertson hatching their five-step, ten-year plan for putting a fundamentalist President in the White House; I drew explicit connections between Terri Schiavo and the pushing through of federal judges not accepted last term; I show documentaries about the war and war coverage from all over the planet... but the neat thing is that we have conversations about all of these things in terms of, "Is this in keeping with the philosophy of the First Amendment?" "Is this the democracy we want to create?" One student stopped int he middle of class conversation last semester and said, "How come you'll say all this stuff and nobody else will?" I also shared with them my own, very personal, Code of Ethics. I've really lessened the distance between them and me in some ways -- it is tricky, but rewarding, too.
Hey you... I have been meaning to email you about being a 3 and this is just easier to hop on your blog and leave it here. I totally hear ya about not wanting to be there. I actually am a 4 with a 3 "wing" so for a long time I thought I was a 3 and was HORRIFIED at that. I really resisited it. And, since not all of it fit I kept looking. The best book out there (in my opinion) is called "The Wisdom of the Enneagram" and it's simply very positive in its descriptions of the types. If you are indeed a three (which I would agree with you... or I thought I could see 7 type too) the good news is that 3's are usually the most attractive people there are, because their focus is external so they typically have beautiful clothes and presentation. The other good thing is that they are highly productive people. The only thing to watch is for your Ego/Identity (the 3) to be making your decisions. Ryan was a three and so he really noticed how much his self-image interacted with people versus his authentic self. He was always impressing others and would sometimes get lost inside that. Either way, none of the types are wrong or bad. The purpose is to sort of meditate on your source / heart, watch the ego/type in action and then return yourself to the all of it (the source/heart). In essence each time you return to the source you are present to the fullness of all the types, as well have all capacities of that within ourselves. I also liken it to young conversations (when our types roar their loud heads and habits)... to upgrade to an adult conversation we let go of those type's tendencies and therefore have more available to us. I love you!
Post a Comment